Hublot Watches Look Great But Fail To Impress As Investments

Hublot’s design appeal remains undeniable in 2025. The bold aesthetics, instantly recognizable oversized cases, and innovative “Art of Fusion” philosophy combining exotic materials like ceramic, sapphire, and rubber create timepieces that command attention the moment they enter a room.

For collectors who prioritize visual impact and contemporary styling, Hublot delivers experiences that few Swiss brands can match.

Yet beneath this striking surface lies a troubling reality that investors cannot ignore. While collectors may appreciate Hublot’s aesthetics and innovative spirit, increasingly they question the brand’s ability to hold or grow value over time.

The disconnect between marketing visibility and investment performance has become impossible to overlook, with secondary market data painting a consistent picture of disappointment.

The focus of this exploration centers on understanding why a brand with such enormous visibility and LVMH backing continues to underdeliver as an investment asset. By examining Hublot’s history, marketing strategy, and actual resale performance, we can reveal the gap between the lifestyle brand promise and the financial reality facing buyers who hope their purchase might appreciate rather than depreciate dramatically.

The History of Hublot

The Hublot story begins in 1980 when Carlo Crocco founded the brand with a radical innovation that challenged Swiss watchmaking conventions. His early standout achievement combined gold and rubber in luxury timepieces, a fusion that traditional Swiss houses considered unthinkable for haute horlogerie. This willingness to break rules and blend materials established DNA that would define Hublot for decades.

Building on this foundation, the brand’s trajectory changed dramatically following LVMH’s acquisition in 2008 and the leadership of Jean-Claude Biver, whose aggressive growth strategy transformed Hublot from niche player into globally recognized luxury brand.

Under Biver’s direction, the company exploded through limited editions, bold designs, and high-profile collaborations spanning sports stars, musicians, and major events that generated constant media attention.

Moving into its modern identity, Hublot built its brand more on visibility, celebrity partnerships, and cultural relevance than on deep horological legacy or technical innovation. Ambassadors including Usain Bolt, Jay-Z, and Kylian Mbappé created associations with success and achievement, establishing strong visibility that resonated in pop culture circles.

However, this positioning came with consequences, as the brand achieved recognition in lifestyle magazines while struggling to earn respect in serious horology circles where collectors discuss heritage, movement development, and long-term value.

How Hublot Built Its Luxury Image Through Fusion and Marketing Power

The “Art of Fusion” became Hublot’s central philosophy and primary differentiator in crowded luxury markets. This concept emphasizes blending materials that traditional Swiss brands avoid, creating timepieces combining ceramic cases, titanium components, sapphire crystals, and rubber straps in ways that challenge conventional aesthetics.

For collectors seeking contemporary design that breaks from traditional watch styling, this approach delivers genuine distinctiveness.

At the same time, Hublot invested massively in sports sponsorships that amplified brand reach far beyond watch enthusiast circles. Partnerships with FIFA, Formula 1, and UEFA Champions League created visibility during global events watched by hundreds of millions, associating the brand with elite competition and achievement.

These sponsorships generated awareness that traditional watch advertising could never match, establishing Hublot as a lifestyle brand rather than purely a watch manufacturer.

Looking at the marketing focus reveals strategic choices that prioritize visibility and lifestyle associations over horological legacy or technical storytelling. While brands like Patek Philippe emphasize centuries of craftsmanship and movement innovation, Hublot’s campaigns stress exclusivity, celebrity partnerships, and bold aesthetics.

This approach succeeds in building brand recognition and attracting buyers seeking status symbols, but creates challenges for long-term investment value.

Building on this marketing-driven foundation, the result is strong consumer recognition but perception as a “luxury fashion watch” rather than an enduring investment piece. Because Hublot lacks deep historic lineage compared to Swiss maisons dating back centuries, its brand equity depends heavily on trends, novelty, and limited edition releases rather than timeless reputation.

For investors, this creates fundamental weakness, as fashion-driven appeal proves far more vulnerable to changing tastes than heritage-based prestige that transcends temporary trends.

Market Prices, Resale Trends, and Collector Sentiment

Current market dynamics reveal the harsh financial realities facing Hublot buyers hoping for value retention or appreciation. Retail prices span dramatic ranges from approximately $7,000 entry points up to $80,000 and beyond for complex models in exotic materials, creating accessibility across different wealth levels while maintaining luxury positioning.

However, moving to secondary market performance exposes systematic weakness that undermines any investment thesis.

WatchCharts data shows Hublot watches averaging about $10,000 in secondary markets, with ranges spanning roughly $3,000 to $63,000 depending heavily on specific models and materials.

More troubling, ChronoHunter analysis reveals many Hublot models depreciate approximately 40% on average relative to retail, placing them “miles away” from brands with stronger value retention.

Looking specifically at flagship Big Bang models, WatchCharts documents secondary trading between $6,000 and $63,000 with averages around $12,000, while The Grey Market Magazine suggests non-precious-metal Big Bangs generally sell between $7,000 and $15,000 in pre-owned condition. For buyers who paid retail prices often ranging from $15,000 to $25,000 for standard configurations, these secondary values represent devastating losses of 40% to 60% shortly after purchase.

Building on depreciation patterns, one resale-focused analysis from Value Your Watch suggests that after initial sharp drops, many Hublot models “bottom out to a solid foundation,” implying residual floor values that prevent complete value destruction.

While this provides some comfort that watches won’t become worthless, it offers little consolation to investors who hoped for appreciation or even modest value retention rather than stabilization at half of retail pricing.

At the same time, exceptions exist within the broader depreciation pattern. Ultra-limited collaborations including Ferrari partnerships and Sang Bleu artist editions retain slightly better value through genuine scarcity and collector interest beyond pure watch enthusiasts. However, these exceptions prove the rule rather than challenging it, as most Hublot production faces systematic devaluation in secondary markets.

Moving to our research team’s analysis, analysts at The Luxury Playbook developed Value Dynamics Index scores across Hublot’s key collections to quantify investment performance systematically. Using five equally weighted factors including liquidity, volatility, ROI growth, scarcity and retention, plus sentiment strength, each normalized on zero to one scales, this methodology reveals which Hublot collections offer best risk-adjusted returns.

Looking at the results, the Spirit of Big Bang achieves the highest composite VDI score of 0.54, driven by its distinctive tonneau case, lower production volumes, and sophisticated engineering including skeleton dials and tourbillon options.

Our analysts note prices remain more stable than typical Hublots, with sought-after references retaining 60% to 70% of MSRP and some limited editions posting modest gains. While liquidity proves moderate as fewer pieces trade, genuine scarcity combined with enthusiast demand supports values better than mass-produced alternatives.

Building on newer releases, the Square Bang line launched in 2022 achieves a promising 0.50 VDI score reflecting limited initial supply that helped retention, with early resale sitting closer to retail than Big Bang norms.

Our research team emphasizes this remains a watchlist category with upside potential if Hublot maintains supply discipline, though long-term trajectory depends on how aggressively the company expands production.

At the same time, the flagship Big Bang collection scores just 0.48 VDI despite being Hublot’s most liquid line. Our analysts note these models sell relatively fast but depreciate sharply in standard configurations, often 30% to 50% off retail when pre-owned.

WatchCharts index data confirms this pattern, showing Big Bang declining approximately 29.7% over five years with specific references like the 301.PM.1780.RX falling 24.8% during the same period. Exceptions exist for truly limited pieces or materially unique variants using sapphire, Magic Gold, or high-profile collaborations that can retain significantly better and occasionally appreciate, creating what our team calls “high liquidity with selective upside.”

Moving to other collections reveals even weaker performance. The Classic Fusion line scores just 0.40 VDI, characterized by our analysts as offering “stable utility but low ROI.” While these clean, versatile watches experience predictable depreciation to roughly 50% to 60% of retail before stabilizing, they function better as “wear and enjoy” pieces rather than appreciation engines.

Limited editions including Berluti and Orlinski collaborations perform better, but the category overall disappoints investors.

Looking at extreme ends of the spectrum, the MP Collection “Masterpiece” ultra-rare technical showcases score 0.48 VDI with what our research team calls “barbell risk.” These illiquid, price-volatile pieces offer highest upside on singular references at auction through rarity and storytelling, but require long holding periods to realize value, making them collector-grade bets rather than liquid investments.

Conversely, the discontinued King Power line scores just 0.36 VDI, with our analysts describing it as a “value trap” featuring oversized cases now out of fashion and deeply discounted with slow liquidity unless priced heavily under market.

Some collectors criticize Hublot’s lower-end pieces as “wildly overpriced” relative to their mechanical substance according to discussions documented by Hodinkee, while dealer blogs warn that Hublot’s retail overpricing combined with weak resale margins contribute to its poor investment reputation.

However, providing some positive context, ChronoPulse index data for Q1 2025 shows Hublot as one of few brands posting slight 0.3% value increases while the general secondary market fell approximately 3%.

While this relative outperformance provides encouragement, it reflects more the brand’s already-depressed valuations creating limited downside rather than genuine strength that would support investment theses.

Why Hublot Struggles To Deliver Strong Investment Returns

Understanding Hublot’s systematic underperformance requires examining structural factors that undermine value regardless of short-term market conditions or specific model appeal. Moving first to production strategy, the overproduction of limited editions dilutes exclusivity and long-term desirability in ways that damage the entire brand.

When Hublot releases dozens of “limited edition” variants annually across multiple collections, the scarcity that creates investment value evaporates, leaving buyers with pieces that feel special at purchase but become just another Hublot in oversaturated secondary markets.

Building on heritage disadvantages, Hublot lacks the centuries-long narrative of older Swiss houses, having been founded only in 1980. While forty-five years represents substantial history for many products, in Swiss watchmaking where brands trace lineages to the 1700s and 1800s,

At the same time, watch investors increasingly perceive Hublot as trend-driven rather than timeless, a categorization that proves devastating for long-term value. When styles change and tomorrow’s collectors view today’s oversized cases and bold rubber straps as dated rather than classic, Hublot pieces risk becoming artifacts of their era rather than transcendent designs.

This perception creates weak investment confidence that manifests through rapid depreciation and thin buyer interest in secondary markets.

Lastly. moving to pricing dynamics, rapid depreciation stems partly from high retail margins that create unsustainable gaps between what buyers pay initially and what subsequent buyers will accept.

When retail pricing includes massive markups for brand positioning rather than reflecting manufacturing costs or material values, secondary buyers naturally discount heavily, recognizing they’re buying the watch without paying for advertising campaigns, sports sponsorships, and celebrity endorsements embedded in original pricing.

FAQ