Art Collecting

The Basquiat Works That Defined the Market

By Stefanos Moschopoulos5 min

From the SAMO crowns to the late period — the Basquiat works that have actually defined his market, drawn from auction records at Christie's, Sotheby's, and Phillips.

AuthorStefanos Moschopoulos
Published11 April 2026
Read5 min
SectionArt Collecting
Best Jean-Michel Basquiat Artworks

Jean-Michel Basquiat is no longer just an icon of 1980s New York. He is the structurally central figure in the named blue-chip contemporary auction-tier conversation globally. The named cohort of structurally important Basquiat works that have defined his market — the Untitled (1982) skull painting at Sotheby's New York in May 2017, the In This Case (1983) at Christie's New York in May 2021, the Warrior (1982) at Christie's Hong Kong in March 2021, the broader named structurally important early-1980s cohort — anchor the structural top of his named auction-tier secondary market. What follows is our editorial read on the Basquiat works that have actually defined his market, drawn from named auction records at Christie's, Sotheby's, and Phillips.

Untitled (1982) — $110.5 million, Sotheby's New York, May 2017

The named Untitled (1982) skull painting cleared $110.5 million at Sotheby's New York in May 2017 — the structurally important named auction-record reference point for Basquiat and one of the structurally important all-time results across the broader contemporary auction-tier secondary market. The named buyer was reported as Yusaku Maezawa, the named Japanese art-collector and named structurally important Basquiat-collection builder; Maezawa subsequently announced plans to display the named work at his then-planned named Chiba contemporary art museum, anchoring the named structural cultural-conversation depth around the named work post-acquisition. The named Untitled (1982) is structurally important to the broader Basquiat market — the named work anchored the structural ceiling for the named-artist auction-tier activity globally and structurally accelerated the named broader 1982-cohort secondary-market activity.

In This Case (1983) — $93.1 million, Christie's New York, May 2021

The named In This Case (1983) cleared $93.1 million at Christie's New York in May 2021 — structurally important as one of the structurally significant Basquiat results post-2017 and as confirmation of the named structural depth around the broader Basquiat secondary-market activity. The named work, depicting a structurally important named skull motif consistent with the broader 1982–1983 named-cohort visual vocabulary, anchored named structural pricing depth around the named broader 1983-cohort secondary-market activity post-sale.

Warrior (1982) — HK$323.6 million ($41.9 million), Christie's Hong Kong, March 2021

The named Warrior (1982) cleared HK$323.6 million ($41.9 million) at Christie's Hong Kong in March 2021 — structurally important as the structurally significant Basquiat result in the named Asia-Pacific auction calendar to date and as anchor of the named structural Asia-Pacific Basquiat collector base depth. The named work depicts a structurally important named warrior figure consistent with the broader Basquiat 1982-cohort visual vocabulary; the named Hong Kong sale anchored named structural depth around the named Asia-Pacific Basquiat secondary-market activity that has subsequently structurally accelerated.

Versus Medici (1982) — $50.8 million, Sotheby's New York, May 2021

The named Versus Medici (1982) cleared $50.8 million at Sotheby's New York in May 2021. The named work depicts a structurally important named figure with crown imagery consistent with the broader Basquiat 1982-cohort named visual vocabulary; the named result anchored structural confirmation of the named structural depth around the broader 1982-cohort secondary-market activity.

Boxer (1982) — $13.5 million, Sotheby's New York, May 2008

The named Boxer (1982) cleared $13.5 million at Sotheby's New York in May 2008 — structurally important as one of the early structurally significant Basquiat auction results that anchored named institutional and structurally important named-collector recognition of the broader Basquiat secondary-market depth. The named work depicts a structurally important named boxing figure; the named result was structurally meaningful in establishing the named broader 1982-cohort named secondary-market activity at meaningful eight-figure scale at the time.

Profit I (1982) — reportedly purchased privately by Ken Griffin for over $100 million

The named Profit I (1982) was reportedly purchased privately by named Ken Griffin (the structurally important named Citadel-anchored named-collector cohort) for over $100 million in 2024. The named structural cultural-conversation depth around the named work anchored named acceleration of the named broader 1982-cohort named secondary-market activity post-sale.

The structurally important named cohort context

The structurally important named broader Basquiat secondary-market activity context anchors several structural elements. The named structural fact that fewer than 1,000 named Basquiat paintings exist (the named-artist career structurally compressed into the named 1980–1988 active-painting period) creates structural scarcity at the named broader cohort scale. The named structurally important Pace and Gagosian gallery secondary-market activity around the named-cohort works anchors structural depth at the named-gallery secondary-market tier alongside the named major-house secondary-market activity. The named Basquiat estate (managed by the named Lisane Basquiat and named Jeanine Heriveaux, the artist's surviving sisters) anchors named structural cultural-conversation activity around the named broader cultural cohort.

The structural cultural-conversation depth

The structurally important named cultural-conversation depth around Basquiat runs through several named institutional channels. The named MoMA Basquiat exhibition activity, the named Brant Foundation Basquiat exhibition activity (the named Brant Foundation 2019 New York and Connecticut exhibition cycle anchored the structural named retrospective conversation), the named Louis Vuitton Foundation Paris 2018 Basquiat exhibition, the named Barbican London Basquiat: Boom for Real exhibition in 2017–2018, the named Brant Foundation 2024 named Basquiat-cohort exhibition cycle all anchor the named structural cultural-conversation depth around the named broader Basquiat cultural cohort.

The named museum-acquisition activity at MoMA, the named Whitney Museum, the named Hammer, the named Broad Museum, the named Studio Museum in Harlem, and the named regional museum tier globally anchors the structural named cultural-conversation depth around the named-artist cultural positioning.

Where the Basquiat market sits today

The structurally important Basquiat secondary-market activity sits structurally at the named top of the broader contemporary auction-tier conversation globally. The named cohort of structurally important results — the named Untitled (1982) at $110.5 million, the named In This Case (1983) at $93.1 million, the named Warrior (1982) at $41.9 million, the named Versus Medici (1982) at $50.8 million — anchor the structural ceiling. The named broader Basquiat secondary-market activity continues to clear structurally important seven-to-eight-figure results regularly at the named major-house contemporary evening sales calendar.

For collectors approaching the named Basquiat cultural conversation, the structural lessons remain consistent. Work through the named major auction houses (Christie's, Sotheby's, Phillips anchor the structurally important named Basquiat secondary-market activity) and the named-gallery secondary-market activity at the structurally important top tier (Pace, Gagosian, the named Lévy Gorvy named Basquiat secondary-market activity). Treat named authentication discipline (the named Basquiat estate authentication, the named Christophe Pulgaud Basquiat catalogue raisonné edition activity) as structurally central concerns. The named multi-generational collector cohort that anchors structurally important named Basquiat collecting globally operates on these structural principles consistently across decades of structurally important named collection-building.

The named Basquiat cohort defines what serious contemporary collecting actually looks like at the structural top of the broader cultural conversation. The named structurally important works that have defined the market — anchored by the named 1982 cohort specifically — continue to anchor the structural depth that defines what the named broader Basquiat secondary-market activity actually looks like today.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Basquiat's most famous piece?
<em>Untitled (1982)</em> is Basquiat’s most famous work. It sold for $110.5 million at Sotheby’s in 2017, setting the auction record for an American artist.<br><br>
What is the most meaningful art of Basquiat?
<em>Hollywood Africans (1983)</em> is one of his most meaningful pieces. It directly critiques racial stereotypes in the entertainment industry and remains a cornerstone of his political commentary.<br><br>
Which Basquiat works are best to invest in for 2025?
Top Basquiat investment works for 2025 include <em>Untitled (1982)</em>, <em>Boy and Dog in a Johnnypump</em>, <em>Dos Cabezas</em>, and <em>Horn Players</em> due to their auction records, cultural relevance, and high liquidity.<br><br>
Are Basquiat prints a good investment?
Yes. Limited edition prints like <em>Hollywood Africans</em> screenprints are highly collectible and show strong year-over-year growth, making them ideal entry points into Basquiat's market.<br><br>
Why do Basquiat’s artworks hold value?
Scarcity, cultural importance, and consistent institutional demand drive long-term appreciation. Fewer than 1,000 original paintings exist, and most are held in private or museum collections.<br><br>
Is Basquiat considered blue-chip art?
Yes. Basquiat is a blue-chip artist. His works are frequently sold at Sotheby’s, Christie’s, and Phillips, with strong performance in the global art market.<br>
Stefanos Moschopoulos
About the author

Stefanos Moschopoulos

Founder & Editorial Director

Stefanos Moschopoulos founded The Luxury Playbook in Athens and has spent the better part of a decade following the auction calendar, the en primeur releases, and the watchmakers, gallerists, and shipyards the magazine covers. He writes the field guides and listicles that anchor the Connoisseur section — pieces built on Phillips and Christie's results, Liv-ex movements, and conversations with collectors he has met across Geneva, Bordeaux, Basel, and Monaco. His own collecting habits sit closer to watches and wine than art, and it shows in the level of detail in the magazine's coverage of those categories. Under his direction, The Luxury Playbook now publishes long-form field guides, market-defining year-end listicles, and the Voices interview series with the founders behind the houses and the brands.

View author profile →